Comparison · 4 material differences
The California Club vs Duquesne Club
This comparison was generated on request from the records. It carries no editorial verdict and is not indexed. The published comparisons are listed on the compare page.
Read down each column for one organization, across a row for the difference. A bronze mark at the left of a cell means the organizations differ on that row. A dash or “not published” means the organization does not disclose the fact; it is not a zero.
What the records say
- Annual dues: The California Club: Not publicly disclosed; Duquesne Club: Not publicly disclosed.
Side by side
| The California Club | Duquesne Club | |
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Type | Private club | Private club |
| Founded | 1888 (The club's own site says only that it has been "a Los Angeles icon for more than a century" and does not print a founding year; 1888 comes from Wikipedia's sourced article.) | 1873 (The club's history page dates its founding to 1873 as a "voluntary association" first led by President John H. Ricketson.) |
| Headquarters | Los Angeles, United States | Pittsburgh, United States |
| Geographic footprint | Single clubhouse at 538 South Flower Street in downtown Los Angeles | Single clubhouse at 325 Sixth Avenue in downtown Pittsburgh |
| Members | Not publicly disclosed | Not publicly disclosed by the club. Wikipedia's article gives approximately 2,700 men and women, a figure it dates to 2007; that has not been independently verified. |
| Chapters | Single clubhouse; no chapters | Single clubhouse; no chapters |
| Primary audience | The club says its members "represent L.A.'s most diverse trailblazers and influencers, who are defining today's city and shaping its future", and describes itself as the city's premier private social club; it publishes no occupational or financial test. | The club says what was once "a fraternity of prominent industrialists has evolved into a social and business retreat for the region's most interesting thinkers and innovative leaders in business, industry, finance, politics, education, philanthropy, law, medicine and the arts". |
| Typical member | Not publicly disclosed. The club describes members in general terms as Los Angeles innovators and influencers and publishes no data on professions, ages or numbers. | Not publicly disclosed in numbers. The club describes members as regional leaders across business, finance, law, medicine, education, politics, philanthropy and the arts. |
| Qualification | ||
| Invitation required | Yes | Yes |
| Sponsor required | Yes | Not documented |
| Application process | There is no public application process. The club states that membership is by invitation from current members and that the membership office is not open to the public. The site lists a membership email address but no form, criteria or timetable. | No application process is published. The club's membership pages describe benefits rather than admission, and there is no application form or membership contact on the public site. |
| Selectivity | Not publicly disclosed. The club publishes no acceptance data, waiting-list information or member cap. | Not publicly disclosed |
| Cost | ||
| Annual dues | Not publicly disclosedverified September 2026 · source ↗ | Not publicly disclosedverified September 2026 · source ↗ |
| Initiation fee | Not publicly disclosedverified September 2026 · source ↗ | Not publicly disclosedverified September 2026 · source ↗ |
| Membership term | Not documented | Not documented |
| Structure | ||
| Meeting frequency | No published meeting schedule; the clubhouse operates on weekdays for breakfast, lunch, dinner and bar service, with signature and family events through the year | No published meeting programme beyond a member events calendar; the six special-interest societies run their own tastings, dinners, classes, tours and outings |
| Peer forums | Not documented | Six member-run special-interest societies: Wine (about 300 members), Art, Rod & Gun, Literary, Culinary and Beer |
| Confidentiality | Not publicly disclosed. The club publishes a technology policy rather than a confidentiality rule: electronics must be silent, and voice and video calls are confined to telephone alcoves and private meeting and dining rooms. | Not publicly disclosed |
| Time commitment | Not documented | Not documented |
| Organized as | Clubhouse premises, Event-focused | Clubhouse premises, Event-focused |
| Confidential peer forums | No | No |
| Local chapters | No | No |
| Virtual membership | No | No |
| Online community | No | No |
| Member directory | Not documented | Not documented |
| Events | Yes | Yes |
| Programming | ||
| Educational programming | Not documented | Partial |
| Leadership development | No | No |
| Retreats | No | No |
| Travel | Partial | Yes |
| Family programming | Yes | Yes |
| Spouse and partner programming | Not documented | Not documented |
| Next-generation programming | Not documented | Not documented |
| Investment discussions | No | No |
| Investment opportunities | No | No |
| Philanthropic component | Not documented | Yes |
| Networking emphasis | Medium | High |
| Social emphasis | High | High |
Next
Sources
Drawn from the sources listed on each page: The California Club · Duquesne Club
