Comparação · 18 diferenças materiais
Resource Generation vs TIGER 21
Esta comparação foi gerada sob demanda a partir dos registros. Não possui veredicto editorial e não é indexada. As comparações publicadas estão listadas em página de comparação.
Leia cada coluna para uma organização, e cada linha para a diferença. Uma marca a bronze à esquerda de uma célula indica que as organizações diferem nessa linha. Um travessão ou "não publicado" significa que a organização não divulga o facto; não é um zero.
Verificado September 2026
Rede filantrópica
Verificado September 2026 Resource Generation
People aged 18 to 35 in the United States who have access to wealth or class privilege placing them in the top 10 per cent by net wealth or income, and who want to redistribute…
Aconselhamento entre pares
TIGER 21
Ultra-high-net-worth entrepreneurs, investors and executives with at least US$20 million in investable assets, many of them post-exit.
O que os registos indicam
- Maximum age at joining: Resource Generation: The core constituency is 18 to 35 year olds; members over 35 move to the Alumni track; TIGER 21: No published maximum age at joining.
- Minimum age: Resource Generation: Constituent and Stepping Stone membership are for people aged 18 to 35; an Alumni track exists for those 36 and over; TIGER 21: No published minimum age.
- Minimum net worth: Resource Generation: Family net wealth of $1 million or more is one of the qualifying tests for access to wealth; TIGER 21: No published minimum net worth.
- Minimum investable assets: Resource Generation: No published minimum investable assets; TIGER 21: At least US$20,000,000 in verifiable investable assets or qualifying net worth.
- Annual dues: Resource Generation: $500 a year; TIGER 21: $34,000 a year.
Lado a lado
| Resource Generation | TIGER 21 | |
|---|---|---|
| Perfil | ||
| Tipo | Philanthropic network | Peer advisory |
| Fundado | 1997 (Resource Generation traces its origins to a 1995 gathering of New England donors and activists that became a collaborative in 1996. It was established as Comfort Zone in 1997 and formally renamed Resource Generation in 2000, with an office in Cambridge. It operated under fiscal sponsorship for 17 years before becoming an independent 501(c)(3) in 2015.) | 1999 (Founded by Michael W. Sonnenfeldt with a single group of six entrepreneurs in New York City who had recently sold their businesses. The name is widely reported to stand for The Investment Group for Enhanced Returns in the 21st Century, which TIGER 21 does not state on the pages reviewed. Headquarters city reported by secondary sources; TIGER 21 does not state it on its about page.) |
| Sede | United States | New York, United States |
| Geographic footprint | United States, with more than 18 local chapters; the published chapter list names 21 cities and states from Maine to Los Angeles | 162 groups across 54 cities worldwide, including North America, Europe, the Middle East, Asia and Oceania, plus virtual groups |
| Membros | 1,100as of September 2026 | 1,900as of September 2026 |
| Capítulos | 18 | 162 |
| Primary audience | People aged 18 to 35 in the United States who have access to wealth or class privilege placing them in the top 10 per cent by net wealth or income, and who want to redistribute rather than grow that wealth | Ultra-high-net-worth entrepreneurs, investors and executives with at least US$20 million in investable assets, many of them post-exit. |
| Membro típico | Members are young people with inherited or earned wealth in the top decile of the US economy. Qualification runs through personal income at roughly the 90th percentile for the member's state (around $105,000 nationally, ranging from about $82,000 to $248,000 by cost of living), significant personal net financial assets, or family wealth: family net wealth of $1 million or more, parental income in the top decile, or ownership of a family foundation. A high net wealth designation covers the top 1 per cent: $1 million or more in liquid assets, an anticipated inheritance of $5 million, or family net wealth of $10 million or more. | Members are wealth creators rather than salaried executives: current and former entrepreneurs, investment managers and senior executives, typically after a liquidity event, whose central problem has shifted from building a business to preserving and allocating capital. |
| Qualification | ||
| Idade máxima na admissão | The core constituency is 18 to 35 year olds; members over 35 move to the Alumni trackverified September 2026 · fonte ↗ | No published maximum age at joining |
| Idade mínima | Constituent and Stepping Stone membership are for people aged 18 to 35; an Alumni track exists for those 36 and overRG states that people aged 18 to 35 with wealth and class privilege are at a pivotal stage for making a lifelong commitment to social movements.verified September 2026 · fonte ↗ | No published minimum age |
| Patrimônio líquido mínimo | Family net wealth of $1 million or more is one of the qualifying tests for access to wealthAlternatives include a parent's income in the top 90th percentile (median around $185,000 for ages 45–65), ownership of a family foundation, or, internationally, $1 million or more in land value, major business interests, or ruling-elite status.verified September 2026 · fonte ↗ | No published minimum net worth |
| Ativos investíveis mínimos | No published minimum investable assets | At least US$20,000,000 in verifiable investable assets or qualifying net worthExcludes personal-use assets. TIGER 21 states that meeting the minimum "does not guarantee admittance".verified September 2026 · fonte ↗ |
| Restrição geográfica | United StatesRG organises young people with access to wealth in the US; its criteria include an international variant for family wealth held abroad.verified September 2026 · fonte ↗ | No published geographic restriction |
| Invitation required | No | No |
| Sponsor required | No | Not documented |
| Application process | Prospective members complete an online intake form, choose the membership track matching their age and access to wealth, pay dues and are connected to a local chapter. There is no vetting committee, sponsorship requirement or interview described; the qualification is self-assessed against RG's published wealth and income percentile thresholds, and the site links to external percentile calculators. | Candidates submit an inquiry and are assessed by a Membership Development Director against the 5Cs. Vetting includes extensive background checks and interviews, and TIGER 21 states the process typically takes about two months. Meeting the capital minimum is explicitly not sufficient on its own. |
| Selectivity | Not publicly disclosed: RG publishes detailed qualification thresholds but no screening or acceptance process. The tests are self-applied. | TIGER 21 states that meeting the US$20 million minimum "does not guarantee admittance" and that other qualitative requirements apply at its discretion. No acceptance rate is published. |
| Custo | ||
| Anuidade | $500 a yearStandard baseline constituent membership dues are $500 a year. RG asks all members, including alumni, to contribute 5 to 10 per cent of their overall annual giving as dues, so members who give more pay more; those for whom $500 is prohibitive may select "other" and pay the percentage instead.verified September 2026 · fonte ↗ | $34,000 a yearNorth America. TIGER 21 states dues vary by location and that annual dues cover all costs of the eleven regularly scheduled monthly meetings.verified September 2026 · fonte ↗ |
| Taxa de adesão | No joining fee is published.verified September 2026 | $5,000 one-timeOne-time initiation fee stated in TIGER 21's membership FAQ.verified September 2026 · fonte ↗ |
| Membership term | Annual | Annual dues covering eleven scheduled monthly meetings; TIGER 21 does not publish a minimum term |
| Estrutura | ||
| Meeting frequency | Chapter organising through the year, all-member programming, webinars and calls, plus national conferences and campaigns | Monthly group meetings, eleven times a year, with the calendar set up to a year in advance |
| Peer forums | Local chapters are the primary unit, supported by chapter and interest-specific listservs. A National Member Council, open to any member, shapes organisational strategy. No confidential facilitated peer-forum structure is published. | Groups start with five founding members and grow selectively to a maximum of fifteen; members meet as a peer group with a moderating Chair. |
| Confidentiality | Not publicly disclosed | Confidentiality is one of the four Conditions members must accept, alongside non-solicitation, participation and transparency. |
| Time commitment | Not documented | Eleven monthly meetings a year plus an annual Portfolio Defense presentation |
| Organized as | Chapter-based, Event-focused, Virtual | Forum-based, Event-focused, Virtual |
| Fóruns confidenciais entre pares | Partial | Yes |
| Capítulos locais | Yes | Yes |
| Associação virtual | Yes | Partial |
| Comunidade online | Yes | Yes |
| Diretório de membros | Partial | Yes |
| Eventos | Yes | Yes |
| Programação | ||
| Programação educativa | Yes | Yes |
| Desenvolvimento de liderança | Yes | Partial |
| Retiros | Yes | Yes |
| Viagem | No | Partial |
| Programação familiar | Partial | Partial |
| Programação para cônjuges e parceiros | No | Partial |
| Programação para a próxima geração | Yes | Partial |
| Discussões de investimento | Partial | Yes |
| Oportunidades de investimento | No | No |
| Componente filantrópico | Yes | Partial |
| Ênfase em networking | Medium | Medium |
| Ênfase social | Medium | Medium |
Próximo
Última verificação: ainda não revisto
Comunicar um erro nesta página
Fontes
Obtido a partir das fontes indicadas em cada página: Resource Generation · TIGER 21