Comparaison · 17 différences notables
Resource Generation vs Women Moving Millions
Cette comparaison a été générée à la demande à partir des données. Elle ne comporte aucun avis éditorial et n'est pas indexée. Les comparaisons publiées sont listées sur la page de comparaison.
Lisez chaque colonne pour une organisation, chaque ligne pour les différences. Un repère bronze à gauche d'une cellule indique que les organisations diffèrent sur cette ligne. Un tiret ou « non publié » signifie que l'organisation ne divulgue pas l'information ; ce n'est pas un zéro.
Vérifié September 2026
Réseau philanthropique
Vérifié September 2026 Resource Generation
People aged 18 to 35 in the United States who have access to wealth or class privilege placing them in the top 10 per cent by net wealth or income, and who want to redistribute…
Réseau philanthropique
Women Moving Millions
Women with significant personal wealth who are willing to commit at least $1 million over ten years to organisations and initiatives benefiting women and girls, plus their…
Ce qu'indiquent les données
- Maximum age at joining: Resource Generation: The core constituency is 18 to 35 year olds; members over 35 move to the Alumni track; Women Moving Millions: No published maximum age at joining.
- Minimum age: Resource Generation: Constituent and Stepping Stone membership are for people aged 18 to 35; an Alumni track exists for those 36 and over; Women Moving Millions: No published minimum age.
- Minimum net worth: Resource Generation: Family net wealth of $1 million or more is one of the qualifying tests for access to wealth; Women Moving Millions: No published minimum net worth.
- Gender: Resource Generation: No published gender; Women Moving Millions: The community is built around women philanthropists and investors.
- Annual dues: Resource Generation: $500 a year; Women Moving Millions: $10,000 a year.
Côte à côte
| Resource Generation | Women Moving Millions | |
|---|---|---|
| Profil | ||
| Type | Philanthropic network | Philanthropic network |
| Fondé | 1997 (Resource Generation traces its origins to a 1995 gathering of New England donors and activists that became a collaborative in 1996. It was established as Comfort Zone in 1997 and formally renamed Resource Generation in 2000, with an office in Cambridge. It operated under fiscal sponsorship for 17 years before becoming an independent 501(c)(3) in 2015.) | 2007 (WMM's own story page dates the founding campaign to 2007, launched by Helen LaKelly Hunt, Ambassador Swanee Hunt and Chris Grumm, then chief executive of the Women's Funding Network. Women Moving Millions, Inc. was later established as a separate entity with a $1.5m grant from J.P. Morgan Chase.) |
| Siège social | United States | New York, United States |
| Geographic footprint | United States, with more than 18 local chapters; the published chapter list names 21 cities and states from Maine to Los Angeles | Members in 16 countries; the organisation is US-based and describes its membership as growing internationally |
| Membres | 1,100as of September 2026 | 400as of September 2026 |
| Chapitres | 18 | WMM has no chapters; it is a single global community organised around events and programmes. |
| Primary audience | People aged 18 to 35 in the United States who have access to wealth or class privilege placing them in the top 10 per cent by net wealth or income, and who want to redistribute rather than grow that wealth | Women with significant personal wealth who are willing to commit at least $1 million over ten years to organisations and initiatives benefiting women and girls, plus their families and next-generation family members |
| Membre type | Members are young people with inherited or earned wealth in the top decile of the US economy. Qualification runs through personal income at roughly the 90th percentile for the member's state (around $105,000 nationally, ranging from about $82,000 to $248,000 by cost of living), significant personal net financial assets, or family wealth: family net wealth of $1 million or more, parental income in the top decile, or ownership of a family foundation. A high net wealth designation covers the top 1 per cent: $1 million or more in liquid assets, an anticipated inheritance of $5 million, or family net wealth of $10 million or more. | Individual members are women philanthropists and investors who have made a formal commitment of $1 million or more over ten years with an explicit gender lens. Separate Family and NextGen tiers exist at lower annual contribution levels; WMM does not publish whether those tiers carry the same $1 million commitment. The community includes donors, impact investors and political advocacy funders. |
| Qualification | ||
| Âge maximum à l'adhésion | The core constituency is 18 to 35 year olds; members over 35 move to the Alumni trackverified September 2026 · source ↗ | No published maximum age at joining |
| Âge minimum | Constituent and Stepping Stone membership are for people aged 18 to 35; an Alumni track exists for those 36 and overRG states that people aged 18 to 35 with wealth and class privilege are at a pivotal stage for making a lifelong commitment to social movements.verified September 2026 · source ↗ | No published minimum age |
| Valeur nette minimale | Family net wealth of $1 million or more is one of the qualifying tests for access to wealthAlternatives include a parent's income in the top 90th percentile (median around $185,000 for ages 45–65), ownership of a family foundation, or, internationally, $1 million or more in land value, major business interests, or ruling-elite status.verified September 2026 · source ↗ | No published minimum net worth |
| Genre | No published gender | The community is built around women philanthropists and investorsWMM describes itself as a community of women; it does not publish a formal exclusionary rule.verified September 2026 · source ↗ |
| Restriction géographique | United StatesRG organises young people with access to wealth in the US; its criteria include an international variant for family wealth held abroad.verified September 2026 · source ↗ | No published geographic restriction |
| Invitation required | No | No |
| Sponsor required | No | Not documented |
| Application process | Prospective members complete an online intake form, choose the membership track matching their age and access to wealth, pay dues and are connected to a local chapter. There is no vetting committee, sponsorship requirement or interview described; the qualification is self-assessed against RG's published wealth and income percentile thresholds, and the site links to external percentile calculators. | Prospective individual members contact WMM to discuss criteria, benefits and process; NextGen and Family applicants complete downloadable application forms published on the community page. WMM publishes a membership brochure. No review committee, interview stage, sponsorship requirement or acceptance criteria beyond the commitment level are described publicly. |
| Selectivity | Not publicly disclosed: RG publishes detailed qualification thresholds but no screening or acceptance process. The tests are self-applied. | Not publicly disclosed: WMM publishes no acceptance rate or review process. The effective filter is the $1 million ten-year giving commitment rather than a screening committee. |
| Coût | ||
| Cotisations annuelles | $500 a yearStandard baseline constituent membership dues are $500 a year. RG asks all members, including alumni, to contribute 5 to 10 per cent of their overall annual giving as dues, so members who give more pay more; those for whom $500 is prohibitive may select "other" and pay the percentage instead.verified September 2026 · source ↗ | $10,000 a yearIndividual membership: $10,000 or more annual contribution to WMM, in addition to the $1 million ten-year giving commitment made to outside organisations.verified September 2026 · source ↗ |
| Droit d'entrée | No joining fee is published.verified September 2026 | No initiation fee is published.verified September 2026 |
| Coûts liés aux événements | Dues are framed as a share of a member's total giving (5 to 10 per cent) with a $500 baseline, rather than a flat price for services. RG states it is more than 95 per cent member-funded so that it does not compete for grants with grassroots organisations. | Not publicly disclosed: WMM runs flagship events including a NextGen Summit but does not publish registration prices.verified September 2026 |
| Membership term | Annual | Annual contribution, alongside a ten-year giving commitment |
| Structure | ||
| Meeting frequency | Chapter organising through the year, all-member programming, webinars and calls, plus national conferences and campaigns | Flagship events including an annual member day and a NextGen Summit, plus member education programmes and collaboration sessions through the year |
| Peer forums | Local chapters are the primary unit, supported by chapter and interest-specific listservs. A National Member Council, open to any member, shapes organisational strategy. No confidential facilitated peer-forum structure is published. | The Exchange, a collaboration platform on which members align goals and pool resources, plus member education programmes; no confidential facilitated peer-forum structure is published |
| Confidentiality | Not publicly disclosed | WMM says it maintains a safe, supportive environment for members to gain clarity in using their resources; no formal confidentiality policy is published. |
| Time commitment | Not documented | Not documented |
| Organized as | Chapter-based, Event-focused, Virtual | Event-focused, Virtual |
| Forums confidentiels entre pairs | Partial | Partial |
| Sections locales | Yes | No |
| Adhésion virtuelle | Yes | Yes |
| Communauté en ligne | Yes | Yes |
| Annuaire des membres | Partial | Not documented |
| Événements | Yes | Yes |
| Programmation | ||
| Programmation éducative | Yes | Yes |
| Développement du leadership | Yes | Yes |
| Séminaires résidentiels | Yes | Not documented |
| Voyage | No | No |
| Programmation familiale | Partial | Yes |
| Programmes pour conjoints et partenaires | No | Not documented |
| Programmation pour la nouvelle génération | Yes | Yes |
| Discussions sur les investissements | Partial | Yes |
| Opportunités d'investissement | No | Partial |
| Volet philanthropique | Yes | Yes |
| Accent mis sur le réseautage | Medium | High |
| Dimension sociale | Medium | Low |
Suivant
Dernière vérification: pas encore examiné
Signaler une erreur sur cette page
Sources
Tiré des sources indiquées sur chaque page: Resource Generation · Women Moving Millions