比較 · 12 重要な相違点
TIGER 21 vs Long Angle
A moderated monthly peer group with published five-figure dues, against a vetted online community that costs nothing to join and earns from what its members choose to buy.
各列を縦に読むと1つの組織の情報が、横に読むと組織間の差異が把握できる。セル左端のブロンズマークは、その行において組織間に差異があることを示す。ダッシュまたは「非公表」は、組織がその情報を開示していないことを意味し、ゼロではない。
Long Angle
High-net-worth founders, executives and investors whose household investable assets exceed US$3 million.
TIGER 21
Ultra-high-net-worth entrepreneurs, investors and executives with at least US$20 million in investable assets, many of them post-exit.
Long Angle and TIGER 21 answer the same question — where does a person with significant liquid wealth find peers who will talk candidly about money — with opposite economics. TIGER 21 charges US$34,000 a year in North America plus a US$5,000 initiation fee, requires US$20 million in investable assets, and delivers eleven moderated meetings a year in a group capped at fifteen. Long Angle requires US$3 million in household assets, vets applicants through a call with an existing member, charges no membership fee, and delivers a continuous online community with live events and an annual retreat; its revenue comes from optional Trusted Circles (six-to-eight-person moderated groups with a twelve-month commitment, price not published) and from syndicated investment vehicles carrying a management fee.
The difference in bar is also a difference in room. TIGER 21's members are concentrated at the ultra-high-net-worth end and are frequently post-exit; Long Angle's published floor admits a far wider band, and the community's own material describes most members as between US$5 million and US$100 million.
並べて比較
| Long Angle | TIGER 21 | |
|---|---|---|
| プロフィール | ||
| 種別 | Invitation-only community | Peer advisory |
| 設立 | 2020 (Founded by two entrepreneurs after their own liquidity events, according to Long Angle's FAQ; the 2020 launch date comes from secondary summaries rather than a dated statement on Long Angle's site.) | 1999 (Founded by Michael W. Sonnenfeldt with a single group of six entrepreneurs in New York City who had recently sold their businesses. The name is widely reported to stand for The Investment Group for Enhanced Returns in the 21st Century, which TIGER 21 does not state on the pages reviewed. Headquarters city reported by secondary sources; TIGER 21 does not state it on its about page.) |
| 本部所在地 | United States | New York, United States |
| Geographic footprint | Members in 45+ countries; primarily an online community with city-based groups and in-person events, including an annual retreat | 162 groups across 54 cities worldwide, including North America, Europe, the Middle East, Asia and Oceania, plus virtual groups |
| 会員 | Not publicly disclosed. Long Angle refers to "thousands of members" across "45+ countries" and to a "350-member annual Retreat", but publishes no total. | 1,900as of September 2026 |
| チャプター | Not applicable. Long Angle has no chapters; it runs city-based and topical groups inside an online community, plus local meetups. | 162 |
| Primary audience | High-net-worth founders, executives and investors whose household investable assets exceed US$3 million. | Ultra-high-net-worth entrepreneurs, investors and executives with at least US$20 million in investable assets, many of them post-exit. |
| 典型的な会員像 | Long Angle states most members fall between US$5 million and US$100 million in net worth, and that the membership is 86 per cent male and 14 per cent female. Members are typically post-liquidity founders, senior operators and professional investors. | Members are wealth creators rather than salaried executives: current and former entrepreneurs, investment managers and senior executives, typically after a liquidity event, whose central problem has shifted from building a business to preserving and allocating capital. |
| Qualification | ||
| 投資可能資産の最低基準 | Household assets exceeding US$3,000,000, including illiquid assets but excluding a primary residenceStated on Long Angle's application page. Third-party summaries cite qualified-client (US$2.2m) and qualified-purchaser (US$5m) tests, which do not match the current published figure.verified September 2026 · 出典 ↗ | At least US$20,000,000 in verifiable investable assets or qualifying net worthExcludes personal-use assets. TIGER 21 states that meeting the minimum "does not guarantee admittance".verified September 2026 · 出典 ↗ |
| Invitation required | No | No |
| Sponsor required | No | Not documented |
| Application process | Applicants complete a short form, attest that household assets exceed US$3 million excluding a primary residence, and accept the no-solicitation policy. A peer member reviews the application and then holds a video call of roughly 25 minutes before membership is granted. | Candidates submit an inquiry and are assessed by a Membership Development Director against the 5Cs. Vetting includes extensive background checks and interviews, and TIGER 21 states the process typically takes about two months. Meeting the capital minimum is explicitly not sufficient on its own. |
| Selectivity | Not publicly disclosed. Long Angle describes vetting by an active member but publishes no acceptance rate. | TIGER 21 states that meeting the US$20 million minimum "does not guarantee admittance" and that other qualitative requirements apply at its discretion. No acceptance rate is published. |
| 費用 | ||
| 年会費 | $0 a year"There is no membership fee and no prescribed way to participate." Standard community access is free.verified September 2026 · 出典 ↗ | $34,000 a yearNorth America. TIGER 21 states dues vary by location and that annual dues cover all costs of the eleven regularly scheduled monthly meetings.verified September 2026 · 出典 ↗ |
| 入会金 | Standard membership is free; costs arise only from optional programmes and investment vehicles. | $5,000 one-timeOne-time initiation fee stated in TIGER 21's membership FAQ.verified September 2026 · 出典 ↗ |
| プログラム参加費 | Trusted Circles are an optional paid programme with a 12-month commitment; Long Angle does not publish the price on its FAQ. A third-party summary reports about US$2,000 a year, which is not confirmed by Long Angle.verified September 2026 · 出典 ↗ | Dues vary by location; the published figures are for North America. |
| Membership term | No fixed term for standard membership; Trusted Circles carry a 12-month commitment | Annual dues covering eleven scheduled monthly meetings; TIGER 21 does not publish a minimum term |
| 構造 | ||
| Meeting frequency | Continuous online participation, plus live events, local meetups and an annual retreat; Trusted Circles meet on a schedule set by the group | Monthly group meetings, eleven times a year, with the calendar set up to a year in advance |
| Peer forums | Trusted Circles are groups of six to eight peers, matched by goals, life stage and net worth, guided by a professional moderator. | Groups start with five founding members and grow selectively to a maximum of fifteen; members meet as a peer group with a moderating Chair. |
| Confidentiality | Members agree to a no-solicitation policy; anonymous posting is available within the community. Long Angle does not publish a formal confidentiality agreement. | Confidentiality is one of the four Conditions members must accept, alongside non-solicitation, participation and transparency. |
| Time commitment | Not documented | Eleven monthly meetings a year plus an annual Portfolio Defense presentation |
| Organized as | Virtual, Event-focused, Forum-based | Forum-based, Event-focused, Virtual |
| 機密性の高いピア・フォーラム | Yes | Yes |
| 地域チャプター一覧 | Partial | Yes |
| バーチャル会員資格 | Yes | Partial |
| オンラインコミュニティ | Yes | Yes |
| 会員名簿 | Yes | Yes |
| イベント | Yes | Yes |
| プログラミング | ||
| 教育プログラム | Yes | Yes |
| リーダーシップ開発 | Partial | Partial |
| リトリート | Yes | Yes |
| 出張・旅行 | No | Partial |
| 家族向けプログラム | Partial | Partial |
| 配偶者・パートナー向けプログラム | Not documented | Partial |
| 次世代向けプログラム | Not documented | Partial |
| 投資に関する情報交換 | Yes | Yes |
| 投資機会 | Yes | No |
| 慈善活動の要素 | Partial | Partial |
| ネットワーキング重視度 | High | Medium |
| 社交重視 | Medium | Medium |
それぞれに適した対象者
上記レコードと分離された編集上の分析。その後に続く 方法論. いずれの組織が優れているとも断定しない；問題は適合性である。
Long Angle tends to suit people from the low millions upward who want the conversation and the directory more than a fixed monthly obligation, who are comfortable that the organization's incentive is to convert free members into paying programmes and investment vehicles, and who value virtual participation. The no-solicitation rule and member-led vetting are the safeguards to weigh against that incentive.
TIGER 21 tends to suit people above US$20 million who want structure — a Chair, a fixed calendar, a Portfolio Defense — and who would rather pay a known price than be sold to. Many people would qualify for both; the choice is about whether the value is in the discipline of the room or in the breadth of the network.
次へ
情報源
各ページに掲載された出典から引用: Long Angle · TIGER 21