Peer Group Guide会员网络情报平台 ★
185 组织机构 · 686 已公开的申请要求 · 1136 来源 独立立场:任何组织均未就其排名或资格分析支付费用 每项数据均注明来源及核实日期

比较 · 14 实质性差异

REF vs TIGER 21

本比较内容系应请求从记录生成,不附编辑评述,亦不作索引。已发布的比较内容列于 对比页面.

纵向阅读每列,可了解单一组织的信息;横向阅读每行,可比较各组织的差异。单元格左侧的铜色标记表示各组织在该行存在差异。短横线或"未公开"表示该组织未披露相关信息,并非数值为零。

已验证 September 2026
同业咨询

REF

CEOs, owners and presidents, with parallel tracks for C-suite executives reporting to the CEO and for high-potential managers on leadership programmes

已验证 September 2026
同业咨询

TIGER 21

Ultra-high-net-worth entrepreneurs, investors and executives with at least US$20 million in investable assets, many of them post-exit.

记录所示内容

并排对比

REFTIGER 21
档案
类型 Peer advisory Peer advisory
成立于 1994 (Entrepreneur's franchise directory records the company as founded in 1994 and franchising since 1994. REF's own site says only "Founded 30 years ago in the USA" and "With 30 years of experience", which is consistent.) 1999 (Founded by Michael W. Sonnenfeldt with a single group of six entrepreneurs in New York City who had recently sold their businesses. The name is widely reported to stand for The Investment Group for Enhanced Returns in the 21st Century, which TIGER 21 does not state on the pages reviewed. Headquarters city reported by secondary sources; TIGER 21 does not state it on its about page.)
总部 San Diego, United States New York, United States
Geographic footprint 51 locations across 20 countries in North America, Central and South America, Europe and Asia; the largest concentration is in Latin America 162 groups across 54 cities worldwide, including North America, Europe, the Middle East, Asia and Oceania, plus virtual groups
成员 3,000as of January 2025 1,900as of September 2026
分会 51 162
Primary audience CEOs, owners and presidents, with parallel tracks for C-suite executives reporting to the CEO and for high-potential managers on leadership programmes Ultra-high-net-worth entrepreneurs, investors and executives with at least US$20 million in investable assets, many of them post-exit.
典型会员 Members are CEOs, owners and presidents of non-competing businesses, plus CXOs and upper management reporting directly to the CEO in the Key Executive track and high performers selected for leadership programmes in the High Potentials track. REF publishes no revenue or headcount threshold, though its application form asks for employee count and revenue. Members are wealth creators rather than salaried executives: current and former entrepreneurs, investment managers and senior executives, typically after a liquidity event, whose central problem has shifted from building a business to preserving and allocating capital.
Qualification
职务或职称 Top Executive track: CEO, owner, president or equivalentREF's own application page lists the candidate requirements for each track.verified September 2026 · 来源 ↗ No published role or title
最低可投资资产要求 No published minimum investable assets At least US$20,000,000 in verifiable investable assets or qualifying net worthExcludes personal-use assets. TIGER 21 states that meeting the minimum "does not guarantee admittance".verified September 2026 · 来源 ↗
Invitation required Sometimes No
Sponsor required No Not documented
Application process Applicants complete an online form selecting one of three tracks (Top Executive, Key Executive or High Potentials) and supplying title, industry, city, country, employee count and revenue. REF then contacts the candidate and, if accepted, places them in a local Forum of non-competing executives with a certified Forum Leader. Candidates submit an inquiry and are assessed by a Membership Development Director against the 5Cs. Vetting includes extensive background checks and interviews, and TIGER 21 states the process typically takes about two months. Meeting the capital minimum is explicitly not sufficient on its own.
Selectivity Not publicly disclosed. REF describes its peer groups as "by invitation only" while operating a public application form, and publishes no acceptance data. TIGER 21 states that meeting the US$20 million minimum "does not guarantee admittance" and that other qualitative requirements apply at its discretion. No acceptance rate is published.
费用
年度会费 Not publicly disclosed. REF publishes no membership price; the Peer Resources directory also recorded fees as unavailable at publication. Members are described elsewhere as paying monthly dues.verified September 2026 · 来源 ↗ $34,000 a yearNorth America. TIGER 21 states dues vary by location and that annual dues cover all costs of the eleven regularly scheduled monthly meetings.verified September 2026 · 来源 ↗
入会费 Not publicly disclosedverified September 2026 $5,000 one-timeOne-time initiation fee stated in TIGER 21's membership FAQ.verified September 2026 · 来源 ↗
Membership term Not documented Annual dues covering eleven scheduled monthly meetings; TIGER 21 does not publish a minimum term
结构
Meeting frequency One Forum morning each month, plus webinars, community events and curated trips and retreats Monthly group meetings, eleven times a year, with the calendar set up to a year in advance
Peer forums Forums of 12-15 executives from non-competing industries, led by a certified REF Forum Leader, meeting monthly in a three-part structure: expert insight, round table, and a member case Groups start with five founding members and grow selectively to a maximum of fifteen; members meet as a peer group with a moderating Chair.
Confidentiality Forums are described as confidential, high-trust environments built on transparency and trust; one senior figure calls the Forum a "Circle of Trust" Confidentiality is one of the four Conditions members must accept, alongside non-solicitation, participation and transparency.
Time commitment One morning a month for the Forum, plus optional events Eleven monthly meetings a year plus an annual Portfolio Defense presentation
Organized as Forum-based, Chapter-based, Event-focused Forum-based, Event-focused, Virtual
保密式同伴论坛 Yes Yes
本地分会 Yes Yes
虚拟会员资格 Not documented Partial
在线社区 Yes Yes
会员名录 Yes Yes
活动 Yes Yes
编程
教育培训项目 Yes Yes
领导力发展 Yes Partial
静修活动 Yes Yes
出行 Yes Partial
家庭活动项目 No Partial
配偶与伴侣项目 No Partial
新生代专项项目 Partial Partial
投资议题讨论 Partial Yes
投资机会 No No
慈善公益部分 No Partial
社交网络侧重点 High Medium
社交导向 Medium Medium
所有数值均来自与各独立页面相同的记录;短横线表示该信息未公布或无法核实。各行按读者决策维度分组,而非按数据类型分组。

下一页

最近验证时间: 尚未审核 报告本页错误

来源

来源于各页面所列的参考资料: REF · TIGER 21