비교 · 15 실질적 차이점
Resource Generation vs Social Venture Partners International
이 비교는 요청에 따라 기록을 바탕으로 생성되었습니다. 편집 의견이 포함되지 않으며 색인화되지 않습니다. 공개된 비교 목록은 비교 페이지.
각 열을 아래로 읽으면 하나의 단체를, 각 행을 옆으로 읽으면 차이를 확인할 수 있습니다. 셀 왼쪽의 동그라미 표시는 해당 행에서 단체 간 차이가 있음을 의미합니다. 대시 또는 "미공개"는 해당 사실을 공개하지 않는 것이며 0이 아닙니다.
인증됨 September 2026
자선 네트워크
인증됨 September 2026 Resource Generation
People aged 18 to 35 in the United States who have access to wealth or class privilege placing them in the top 10 per cent by net wealth or income, and who want to redistribute…
자선 네트워크
Social Venture Partners International
Individuals, couples, families, businesses and funders who want to give money and professional skills to nonprofits in their own city, rather than write cheques at a distance
기록이 나타내는 내용
- Maximum age at joining: Resource Generation: The core constituency is 18 to 35 year olds; members over 35 move to the Alumni track; Social Venture Partners International: No published maximum age at joining.
- Minimum age: Resource Generation: Constituent and Stepping Stone membership are for people aged 18 to 35; an Alumni track exists for those 36 and over; Social Venture Partners International: No published minimum age.
- Minimum net worth: Resource Generation: Family net wealth of $1 million or more is one of the qualifying tests for access to wealth; Social Venture Partners International: No published minimum net worth.
- Geographic restriction: Resource Generation: United States; Social Venture Partners International: Partners join a local affiliate; membership is not sold by SVPI directly.
- Annual dues: Resource Generation: $500 a year; Social Venture Partners International: $5,000 a year.
나란히 비교
| Resource Generation | Social Venture Partners International | |
|---|---|---|
| 프로필 | ||
| 유형 | Philanthropic network | Philanthropic network |
| 설립 연도 | 1997 (Resource Generation traces its origins to a 1995 gathering of New England donors and activists that became a collaborative in 1996. It was established as Comfort Zone in 1997 and formally renamed Resource Generation in 2000, with an office in Cambridge. It operated under fiscal sponsorship for 17 years before becoming an independent 501(c)(3) in 2015.) | 1997 (Social Venture Partners was founded in Seattle in 1997 by Paul Brainerd with Scott Oki, Ida Cole, Bill Neukom, Doug Walker and Maggie Walker. Social Venture Partners International, the network body, is younger: SVPI's 2027 Global Summit marks "30 years of SVP and 25 years of SVPI", implying SVPI dates to around 2002.) |
| 본사 | United States | United States |
| Geographic footprint | United States, with more than 18 local chapters; the published chapter list names 21 cities and states from Maine to Los Angeles | Affiliates in around 30 cities across six countries, including the United States, Canada, Japan and India |
| 회원 | 1,100as of September 2026 | 2,198as of March 2024 |
| 지부 | 18 | 30 |
| Primary audience | People aged 18 to 35 in the United States who have access to wealth or class privilege placing them in the top 10 per cent by net wealth or income, and who want to redistribute rather than grow that wealth | Individuals, couples, families, businesses and funders who want to give money and professional skills to nonprofits in their own city, rather than write cheques at a distance |
| 일반적인 회원 | Members are young people with inherited or earned wealth in the top decile of the US economy. Qualification runs through personal income at roughly the 90th percentile for the member's state (around $105,000 nationally, ranging from about $82,000 to $248,000 by cost of living), significant personal net financial assets, or family wealth: family net wealth of $1 million or more, parental income in the top decile, or ownership of a family foundation. A high net wealth designation covers the top 1 per cent: $1 million or more in liquid assets, an anticipated inheritance of $5 million, or family net wealth of $10 million or more. | Partners are individuals, couples, families, businesses and funders who commit both a financial contribution and skilled volunteer time. The model originated among Pacific Northwest technology wealth in the 1990s and remains professional rather than ultra-high-net-worth: SVP Seattle asks partners to average $5,000 a year and states plainly that even this locks out many people, offering flexibility on the figure. |
| Qualification | ||
| 가입 시 최대 연령 | The core constituency is 18 to 35 year olds; members over 35 move to the Alumni trackverified September 2026 · 출처 ↗ | No published maximum age at joining |
| 최소 연령 | Constituent and Stepping Stone membership are for people aged 18 to 35; an Alumni track exists for those 36 and overRG states that people aged 18 to 35 with wealth and class privilege are at a pivotal stage for making a lifelong commitment to social movements.verified September 2026 · 출처 ↗ | No published minimum age |
| 최소 순자산 | Family net wealth of $1 million or more is one of the qualifying tests for access to wealthAlternatives include a parent's income in the top 90th percentile (median around $185,000 for ages 45–65), ownership of a family foundation, or, internationally, $1 million or more in land value, major business interests, or ruling-elite status.verified September 2026 · 출처 ↗ | No published minimum net worth |
| 지역 제한 | United StatesRG organises young people with access to wealth in the US; its criteria include an international variant for family wealth held abroad.verified September 2026 · 출처 ↗ | Partners join a local affiliate; membership is not sold by SVPI directlyAffiliates operate in around 30 cities across six countries.verified September 2026 · 출처 ↗ |
| Invitation required | No | No |
| Sponsor required | No | No |
| Application process | Prospective members complete an online intake form, choose the membership track matching their age and access to wealth, pay dues and are connected to a local chapter. There is no vetting committee, sponsorship requirement or interview described; the qualification is self-assessed against RG's published wealth and income percentile thresholds, and the site links to external percentile calculators. | Prospective partners contact their local affiliate rather than SVPI. SVP Seattle publishes a four-step route: attend a new partner information session, meet with staff or a board member, complete a new partner form and make a personally significant gift, then choose which grant committees, volunteer engagements or advocacy work to join. Communities without an affiliate can apply to SVPI to start one. |
| Selectivity | Not publicly disclosed: RG publishes detailed qualification thresholds but no screening or acceptance process. The tests are self-applied. | Not publicly disclosed: no acceptance criteria or rejection process is published. The model is explicitly inclusive: affiliates set flexible contribution levels rather than screening applicants. |
| 비용 | ||
| 연회비 | $500 a yearStandard baseline constituent membership dues are $500 a year. RG asks all members, including alumni, to contribute 5 to 10 per cent of their overall annual giving as dues, so members who give more pay more; those for whom $500 is prohibitive may select "other" and pay the percentage instead.verified September 2026 · 출처 ↗ | $5,000 a yearSVP Seattle asks partners to give an average of $5,000 a year, about $420 a month, and states explicitly that the figure is flexible based on capacity. This is one affiliate's level, not a network-wide fee.verified September 2026 · 출처 ↗ |
| 가입비 | No joining fee is published.verified September 2026 | No joining fee is published.verified September 2026 |
| 행사 비용 | Dues are framed as a share of a member's total giving (5 to 10 per cent) with a $500 baseline, rather than a flat price for services. RG states it is more than 95 per cent member-funded so that it does not compete for grants with grassroots organisations. | Not publicly disclosed: Global Summit registration prices are not published; the 2027 Mumbai summit reached venue capacity and closed registration with a waitlist.verified September 2026 · 출처 ↗ |
| Membership term | Annual | Annual, renewed at affiliate level; SVPI reports an 89 per cent average partner retention rate across the network |
| 구조 | ||
| Meeting frequency | Chapter organising through the year, all-member programming, webinars and calls, plus national conferences and campaigns | Affiliate-level grant committee meetings, volunteer engagements and events through the year, plus SVPI fireside chats and the Global Summit |
| Peer forums | Local chapters are the primary unit, supported by chapter and interest-specific listservs. A National Member Council, open to any member, shapes organisational strategy. No confidential facilitated peer-forum structure is published. | No confidential peer-forum structure. Partners work in affiliate-level grant committees and pro bono consulting teams serving nonprofit investees. |
| Confidentiality | Not publicly disclosed | Not publicly disclosed |
| Time commitment | Not documented | Not documented |
| Organized as | Chapter-based, Event-focused, Virtual | Chapter-based, Event-focused |
| 기밀 유지 동료 포럼 | Partial | Partial |
| 지역 챕터 | Yes | Yes |
| 가상 회원제 | Yes | No |
| 온라인 커뮤니티 | Yes | Partial |
| 회원 디렉터리 | Partial | Not documented |
| 이벤트 | Yes | Yes |
| 프로그래밍 | ||
| 교육 프로그램 | Yes | Yes |
| 리더십 개발 | Yes | Yes |
| 수련회 | Yes | No |
| 여행 | No | Partial |
| 가족 프로그램 | Partial | Partial |
| 배우자 및 파트너 프로그램 | No | Partial |
| 차세대 프로그램 | Yes | Not documented |
| 투자 관련 토론 | Partial | Partial |
| 투자 기회 | No | No |
| 자선·사회공헌 요소 | Yes | Yes |
| 네트워킹 중점도 | Medium | High |
| 소셜 중심 | Medium | Medium |
다음
최종 확인일: 아직 검토되지 않음
이 페이지의 오류 신고
출처
각 페이지에 기재된 출처에서 수집됨: Resource Generation · Social Venture Partners International