Peer Group GuideThe membership-network intelligence platform ★
185 organizations · 686 published requirements · 1136 sources Independent: no organization pays for its ranking or its eligibility analysis Every figure carries its source and the date it was verified

Comparison · 16 material differences

The Clubhouse vs Washington Athletic Club

This comparison was generated on request from the records. It carries no editorial verdict and is not indexed. The published comparisons are listed on the compare page.

Read down each column for one organization, across a row for the difference. A bronze mark at the left of a cell means the organizations differ on that row. A dash or “not published” means the organization does not disclose the fact; it is not a zero.

Verified September 2026
Private club

The Clubhouse

The company describes itself as "the smarter alternative to a London office for fast growing SMEs and global organisations" and says it was "created by business leaders for…

What the records say

Side by side

The ClubhouseWashington Athletic Club
Profile
Type Private club Private club
Founded 2012 (Founded in 2012 by Amanda Hamilton, with the first site at 8 St James's Square. The company's own pages do not state a founding year.) 1930 (The clubhouse opened in 1930 as Seattle's third-tallest building; ground was broken on 16 December 1929 and the building was completed in December 1930. The club dates itself from 1930.)
Headquarters London, United Kingdom Seattle, United States
Geographic footprint Three London locations: St James's (8 St James's Square), Mayfair (50 Grosvenor Hill) and Holborn Circus (20 St Andrew Street). Members also get access to IWG portfolio locations worldwide. Single 21-floor clubhouse in downtown Seattle; a non-resident Envoy membership serves people living and working outside the greater Seattle metropolitan area
Members Not publicly disclosed. The Evening Standard reported more than 800 individual members and 250 corporate clients in March 2016; that figure predates the 2019 administration and change of ownership. Not publicly disclosed
Chapters 3 Single clubhouse; no chapters
Primary audience The company describes itself as "the smarter alternative to a London office for fast growing SMEs and global organisations" and says it was "created by business leaders for business leaders" The club says its members are leaders in their industries and presents itself as a fitness, professional and social club for Seattle; a separate Envoy (non-resident) membership is reserved for people living and working outside the greater Seattle metropolitan area, and a Corporate Wellness programme is offered to employers.
Typical member Business owners, executives and professionals who need a central London base for meetings and work between them, plus corporate accounts. The company names Deloitte, Amazon, Sky, Samsung, Santander and Tesla among its members. Members are Seattle-area professionals and families, plus non-resident Envoy members who use the club as a Seattle base. The club runs childcare, family traditions and youth camps alongside its professional programming. No current membership total is published.
Qualification
Geographic restriction No published geographic restriction Envoy (non-resident) membership is reserved for those living and working outside the greater Seattle metropolitan areaResident membership covers people based in the Seattle areaverified September 2026 · source ↗
Invitation required No No
Sponsor required No Not documented
Application process Prospective members choose a tier and contract length and enquire through a web form or by telephone. There is no published application form, committee stage, sponsor requirement or interview. Prospective members complete an online tour request form giving name, employer, contact details and whether they know current members, then take a clubhouse tour. Applications are reviewed and must be approved by the Membership and Marketing Committee and the WAC Board of Governors. Memberships start on the first of each month. Employers can enquire separately about the Corporate Wellness membership programme.
Selectivity Not publicly disclosed; no vetting process is described Not publicly disclosed. The club confirms a committee and board approval step but publishes no criteria, acceptance rate or waiting list.
Cost
Annual dues Prices are published per month and exclude VAT; annual cost depends on the tier and contract length chosen. Not publicly disclosedverified September 2026 · source ↗
Monthly dues £190–225 a monthExecutive Member (a London base five days per month): £190 plus VAT on a 24-month term, £200 plus VAT on 12 months, £225 plus VAT month-to-monthverified September 2026 · source ↗ The club publishes no dues or initiation figures; prospective members are directed to schedule a tour or email the membership office.
Initiation fee No joining fee is stated on the memberships pageverified September 2026 · source ↗ Not publicly disclosedverified September 2026 · source ↗
Membership term Month-to-month, 12-month or 24-month contracts, priced differently Memberships begin on the first of a month; renewal terms are not published
Structure
Meeting frequency Daily access according to tier; the company runs a news and events programme for members More than 200 educational, cultural and social events a year and more than 90 fitness classes weekly; affinity groups meet regularly
Peer forums Not documented Affinity groups ("clubs within the Club") organised around shared interests
Confidentiality Not publicly disclosed Not publicly disclosed
Time commitment Tiers are defined by usage: five days a month (Executive), ten days a month (Club) or unlimited (House) Not documented
Organized as Clubhouse premises Clubhouse premises, Event-focused
Confidential peer forums No No
Local chapters Yes No
Virtual membership Yes Partial
Online community Not documented Partial
Member directory Not documented Yes
Events Yes Yes
Programming
Educational programming No Partial
Leadership development No Partial
Retreats No No
Travel Partial Yes
Family programming No Yes
Spouse and partner programming No Not documented
Next-generation programming No Yes
Investment discussions No No
Investment opportunities No No
Philanthropic component No Yes
Networking emphasis Medium High
Social emphasis Low High
Every value comes from the same records as the individual pages; a dash means the fact is not published or verifiable. Rows are grouped by what a reader decides on, not by data type.

Next

Last verified: not yet reviewed Report an error on this page

Sources

Drawn from the sources listed on each page: The Clubhouse · Washington Athletic Club