Investment community · Investor networks · HNW networks
Keiretsu Forum
Accredited private equity angel investors, venture capitalists and corporate or institutional investors
A profile page holds what the organization publishes and what named sources report: who it admits, what it costs, how it is structured, where it operates, and how it has changed. Every figure carries the date it was checked. A dash means the organization does not publish that fact.
Founding — Founded in California by Randy Williams.
Keiretsu Forum is a global angel investment network founded in California in 2000 by Randy Williams. It operates 53 chapters across four continents, with individual chapters capped at 150 members and a worldwide membership of more than 2,500. Members must be accredited investors as defined under Regulation D, and admission is described as by invitation, extended to active investors who are established in their local business community. The model is chapter-based and meeting-driven: companies are screened at a deal-screening session, selected companies present at the monthly forum meeting, and members conduct collaborative due diligence before investing individually rather than through a pooled vote. Individual investments typically range from USD 25,000 to USD 500,000. Keiretsu recommends that new members do not invest during their first six months, using the period to join due diligence teams and learn the process instead. There is no minimum investment requirement. An affiliated fund vehicle, Keiretsu Capital, invests alongside the network. In 2021 the organisation reported more than 380 company fundings across the network.
How it works
A prospective member attends a chapter meeting as a guest, submits an application and meets the local chapter president. Members pay an annual fee that gives access to meetings at any chapter worldwide. Each month, companies are filtered at deal screening and a shortlist presents to the full forum; members form due diligence teams and then invest individually. New members are advised to spend their first six months in due diligence rather than investing.
Typical member
Members must be accredited investors under Regulation D. Keiretsu describes them as active private equity investors and respected members of the business community who contribute time and expertise to portfolio companies. Individual cheques into a deal typically run from USD 25,000 to USD 500,000.
Membership requirements
Requirements in detail, with history →Requirements are the tests the organization itself publishes — an age ceiling, a company-revenue floor, a net-worth minimum, a role. Where a figure straddles a range, the organization's own assessment decides. Local chapters can apply stricter tests than the published standard.
| Criterion | Published requirement | Provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Accredited-investor status | Members must be accredited investors as defined under Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933 and applicable securities laws | Verified September 2026High confidenceSource ↗ |
| Invitation | Membership is by invitation only, extended to active investors who are respected members of the business community | Verified September 2026High confidenceSource ↗ |
| Other criterion | No minimum investment is required; Keiretsu states members should invest only when satisfied by their own due diligence | Verified September 2026High confidenceSource ↗ |
Published criteria as verified on the dates shown. Final eligibility and admission decisions belong entirely to Keiretsu Forum. See how you compare against these criteria →
Initiation fees are paid once on joining; dues recur. Chapter dues, retreats, travel and events are usually additional and are listed separately when the organization discloses them. Figures are as published or reported on the date shown — not quotations.
| Cost | First year | Three years | Provenance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual duesa year | $3,250 | $9,750 | Verified September 2026Medium confidenceSource ↗ | |
| Application fee | No fee to apply for membership. Companies pay nothing to apply or present at deal screening, but an administrative fee applies if a company is selected to present at the full forum meeting; the amount is not published. | Source ↗ | ||
| Estimated total, disclosed figures only | $3,250 | $9,750 | Not counted: Application fee. | |
Structure and programming
Where it operates
17 cities with a page on this siteKeiretsu Forum reports 53 chapters in total; those verified for major cities are listed here.
| Chapter or location | City |
|---|---|
| Keiretsu Forum Sydney | Sydney |
| Keiretsu Forum Vancouver/British Columbia | Vancouver |
| Keiretsu Forum Toronto | Toronto |
| Keiretsu Forum Mumbai | Mumbai |
| Keiretsu Forum Singapore | Singapore |
| Keiretsu Forum United Arab Emirates | Dubai |
| Keiretsu Forum London | London |
| Keiretsu Forum Los Angeles | Los Angeles |
| Keiretsu Forum San Francisco | San Francisco |
| Keiretsu Forum Denver and Boulder/Rockies | Denver |
| Keiretsu Forum Washington D.C. | Washington |
| Keiretsu Forum South Florida | Miami |
| Keiretsu Forum Atlanta | Atlanta |
| Keiretsu Forum MWNE Chicago | Chicago |
| Keiretsu Forum Boston | Boston |
| Keiretsu Forum New York | New York |
| Keiretsu Forum Seattle/Northwest | Seattle |
Independent context
Keiretsu's scale is its distinguishing feature: the annual fee is described as a global access fee, so a member in one city can attend meetings anywhere in the network, which no other group in this batch offers. The 150-member chapter cap keeps individual meetings workable while the aggregate network stays large. Two caveats matter. First, fees are set and published at chapter level rather than centrally - the figures recorded here come from the Northwest chapter, and corporations, venture funds, family offices and entrepreneurs in residence are on a different, unpublished schedule. Second, presenting companies pay an administrative fee to appear at the full forum, a model that has drawn criticism across the angel-group sector for putting founders on the paying side. The recommended six-month observation period before investing is a genuine investor-protection practice and unusual among angel groups.
Editorial analysis by Peer Group Guide editors. It is separated from the record above and follows the editorial policy.
Similar organizations
Alternatives, grouped by need →Appears in: The best investor networks for an accredited investor
History and changes
Site-wide change log →- milestoneFounded in California by Randy Williams ↗
- milestoneThe global network reported more than 380 company fundings in the year ↗
Milestones as published by the organization or reported by a named source. “Record” entries are changes to this site’s own record of the organization, kept in the public change log rather than overwritten.
Take the next step
Check how you compare
Run the published criteria against a profile given in ranges. Nothing is stored.
Open the qualification toolRequest membership information
We pass on only what you agree to share, and only where the organization participates. You see exactly what is sent before you send it.
Request information Apply on their site ↗Follow this organization
One email when its requirements or fees change.
Sources
- Keiretsu Forum, Keiretsu Forum. Accessed 6 September 2026.tier 1
- Chapters — Keiretsu Forum, Keiretsu Forum. Accessed 6 September 2026.tier 1
- Membership — Keiretsu Forum, Keiretsu Forum. Accessed 6 September 2026.tier 2
- FAQ — Keiretsu Forum, Keiretsu Forum. Accessed 6 September 2026.tier 2
- Membership FAQs — Keiretsu Forum Northwest, Keiretsu Forum Northwest. Accessed 6 September 2026.tier 2
Source tiers follow the published hierarchy: 1 official site · 2 official membership materials · 3 application documents · 4 annual reports · 5 government filings · 6 reliable business publications · 7 credible interviews · 8 other reputable secondary sources. Sources and data policy.
Is something wrong or out of date?
Represent Keiretsu Forum? Verified representatives can submit corrections to fees, criteria, chapters and contact details, and add approved material. Submissions are reviewed by an editor and shown as organization-supplied; they never overwrite independent research.