R360's alternatives are TIGER 21, which publishes a lower bar and a price, and the family-office networks, which serve the same fortunes through a different door: peer exchange and research for principals and their office executives rather than a chapter community organised around six forms of capital. For families whose interest is giving, the philanthropic networks with a pledge as the entry test are the comparable rooms.
If you want a published bar and price
TIGER 21 publishes US$20 million and US$34,000; Long Angle publishes US$3 million and no fee.
If your interest is the family office
Peer networks for principals and family-office executives.
If your interest is giving
A giving commitment rather than a wealth test is the entry criterion.
With a lower published wealth threshold
Published minimum net worth or investable assets below the threshold shown for R360.
| 组织 | 类型 | 已公开的财富门槛 |
|---|---|---|
| Long Angle | 仅限受邀加入的社群 | $3M |
| TIGER 21 | 同业咨询 | $20M |
| Resource Generation | 慈善公益网络 | $1M |
| Institute for Private Investors | 家族办公室网络 | $30M |
| Gobundance | 付费智囊团 | $1M |
Similar structure
The same organizational type: invitation-only community.
| 组织 | 类型 |
|---|---|
| Long Angle | 仅限受邀加入的社群 |
| PEWIN | 仅限受邀加入的社群 |
| Summit | 仅限受邀加入的社群 |
| Dynamite Circle | 仅限受邀加入的社群 |
| Helm | 仅限受邀加入的社群 |
| Council on Foreign Relations | 仅限受邀加入的社群 |
所有同类组织
12| 组织 | 类型 | 比较 |
|---|---|---|
| Long Angle | 仅限受邀加入的社群 | R360 vs Long Angle |
| TIGER 21 | 同业咨询 | R360 vs TIGER 21 |
| Resource Generation | 慈善公益网络 | R360 vs Resource Generation |
| Institute for Private Investors | 家族办公室网络 | R360 vs Institute for Private Investors |
| Gobundance | 付费智囊团 | R360 vs Gobundance |
| PEWIN | 仅限受邀加入的社群 | R360 vs PEWIN |
| Summit | 仅限受邀加入的社群 | R360 vs Summit |
| Dynamite Circle | 仅限受邀加入的社群 | R360 vs Dynamite Circle |
| Helm | 仅限受邀加入的社群 | R360 vs Helm |
| Council on Foreign Relations | 仅限受邀加入的社群 | R360 vs Council on Foreign Relations |
| Family Office Association | 家族办公室网络 | R360 vs Family Office Association |
| Forward Global | 慈善公益网络 | R360 vs Forward Global |